I say one thing, mine is a concept, although some elements may be the same as chess.com, look at the whole.
@StefanoG01 said in #12:
> *UPDATE* I added another image.
>
> imgur.com/a/Y7vl0JS
Ur updates are nice but I don't think so that lichess would add them as it would be thinked as a copy of chess.com
Plus recently updated to V2 version lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/blog-XMvcJSwAADkA0hPE?page=1 (recently means only 2 years ago)
This would be considered as v3 if it is implemented
> *UPDATE* I added another image.
>
> imgur.com/a/Y7vl0JS
Ur updates are nice but I don't think so that lichess would add them as it would be thinked as a copy of chess.com
Plus recently updated to V2 version lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/blog-XMvcJSwAADkA0hPE?page=1 (recently means only 2 years ago)
This would be considered as v3 if it is implemented
@StefanoG01 said in #8:
> Non capisco a pieno cosa vuoi sottolineare. Infatti se noti nelle foto c'è un riquadro dove spiega la "Variante", ti fa vedere la continuazione migliore.
As the back translation to German of my own text indeed is not what I intented to say, I'll try it with a different wording:
Telling what would have been your opponent's best move gives away information about what your next move should be. This is not acceptable. E.g. your opponent's best move might avoid a tactic you had not spotted yourself until you saw the defense of it.
> Non capisco a pieno cosa vuoi sottolineare. Infatti se noti nelle foto c'è un riquadro dove spiega la "Variante", ti fa vedere la continuazione migliore.
As the back translation to German of my own text indeed is not what I intented to say, I'll try it with a different wording:
Telling what would have been your opponent's best move gives away information about what your next move should be. This is not acceptable. E.g. your opponent's best move might avoid a tactic you had not spotted yourself until you saw the defense of it.
LIChess is tyrannical, I just now declined to play against someone whose rating was 60 points mire than mine, LIChess blocked me from continuing to play for NINETEEN HOURS. That is insane. Why am I not allowed to decline to play? What purpose does that serve? And why does LIChess consistently give me opponents with higher ratings than mine? They say they aim to "provide a pleasant experience for everyone." Well, it's not a pleasant experience top be blocked for nineteen hours. What on earth can that mean?
@Sam_125 said in #13:
> Ur updates are nice but I don't think so that lichess would add them as it would be thinked as a copy of chess.com
> Plus recently updated to V2 version lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/blog-XMvcJSwAADkA0hPE?page=1 (recently means only 2 years ago)
> This would be considered as v3 if it is implemented
I repeat, you cannot say that the menu on the right is the same as chess.com, it is not true. I simply tried to improve the menu that was already there.
> Ur updates are nice but I don't think so that lichess would add them as it would be thinked as a copy of chess.com
> Plus recently updated to V2 version lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/blog-XMvcJSwAADkA0hPE?page=1 (recently means only 2 years ago)
> This would be considered as v3 if it is implemented
I repeat, you cannot say that the menu on the right is the same as chess.com, it is not true. I simply tried to improve the menu that was already there.
@sheckley666 said in #14:
> As the back translation to German of my own text indeed is not what I intented to say, I'll try it with a different wording:
> Telling what would have been your opponent's best move gives away information about what your next move should be. This is not acceptable. E.g. your opponent's best move might avoid a tactic you had not spotted yourself until you saw the defense of it.
Could you explain it with a photo or a more detailed example? I have done nothing but "improve" what was already there.
> As the back translation to German of my own text indeed is not what I intented to say, I'll try it with a different wording:
> Telling what would have been your opponent's best move gives away information about what your next move should be. This is not acceptable. E.g. your opponent's best move might avoid a tactic you had not spotted yourself until you saw the defense of it.
Could you explain it with a photo or a more detailed example? I have done nothing but "improve" what was already there.
I don't even think a Lichess developer is reading this thread at this point.
@StefanoG01 said in #17:
> Could you explain it with a photo or a more detailed example? I have done nothing but "improve" what was already there.
Sorry, I'm too lazy for that.
> Could you explain it with a photo or a more detailed example? I have done nothing but "improve" what was already there.
Sorry, I'm too lazy for that.
This discussion is comical to say the least. It seems obvious to me that the proposed change would be to postgame analysis, not to game play, but apparently not everyone sees it that way. @StefanoG01 As I said before, if you would show your design side by side with what lichess currently does, then more people would understand what you're talking about.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj60OAh7O5U
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj60OAh7O5U
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.