Free online Chess server. Play Chess now in a clean interface. No registration, no ads, no plugin required. Play Chess with the computer, friends or random opponents.
Play
Create a gameTournamentSimultaneous exhibitions
Learn
Chess basicsPuzzlesPracticeCoordinatesStudyCoaches
Watch
Lichess TVCurrent gamesStreamersBroadcasts (beta)Video library
Community
PlayersTeamsForumQuestions & Answers
Tools
Analysis boardOpening explorerBoard editorImport gameAdvanced search
Sign in
Reconnecting
  1. Forum
  2. Lichess Feedback
  3. Lichess Analysis not always correct

Hello,

Sometimes Lichess judges moves as mistakes (or blunders). In this game (below) that is definitely not the case! Here I played as white and made a good move, but Lichess noted it as a mistake.
I know this is not the easiest thing to program, but can you take a look at it? Thanks!

lichess.org/Z771hjMQ/white#40

The engine often disagree with itself at different depths.

By heading the black king into the whites territory, that king should have expected trouble. During the opening or middle games, if the king stays in their own territory they tend to have a longer game life. Wait until the end game to bring a king towards the centre.

Example by playing poorly a rook there was a mate:
21. ... Rab8 22. Bxh6 Ra8 23. Rh21#

Placing the king anywhere else, would place the king in a better position than that move 20. ... Ke5.

Horizon effect: Expected moves are different depending on the depth of perception.

Nc3 would have won two pieces, and most of black's pawns soon thereafter. Bxh6 also wins two pieces, but takes longer to do so. It seems Stockfish missed the line where this happens, and the +7.8 evaluation came from a line (d5 Rhf1) where white only wins the one piece and several pawns.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.