Your network blocks the Lichess assets!

lichess.org
Donate

I really don’t like the new look for “FIDE Players”

@SergioGlorias said in #10:

I still think that now there is just too much going on, lots of random stuff that are now huge, like the game result, which used to just be a small “1-0” and now it’s a huge square, like the “1” on the side that one and “0” on the losing side.

opinion for stream viewer: the information was too small for those watching

Oh you mean like on live streams, the results were too small to see? Yeah I get that as a point, i still think it’s a bit too big but it’s the tournament standings + FIDE players new looks that I think is the worst and would like it to change back, its too big and has too much going on, especially with the rating graph for FIDE Players

@SergioGlorias said in #10: > > I still think that now there is just too much going on, lots of random stuff that are now huge, like the game result, which used to just be a small “1-0” and now it’s a huge square, like the “1” on the side that one and “0” on the losing side. > > opinion for stream viewer: the information was too small for those watching Oh you mean like on live streams, the results were too small to see? Yeah I get that as a point, i still think it’s a bit too big but it’s the tournament standings + FIDE players new looks that I think is the worst and would like it to change back, its too big and has too much going on, especially with the rating graph for FIDE Players

I'm writing to give my feedback on the new broadcast feature. While I appreciate that you're always improving the site, I feel this particular change is a downgrade.
The new design looks cluttered, especially for local tournaments where lower-rated players often don't have FIDE photos. The result looks awkward. The older version, with just names, was much cleaner, more compact, and non-intrusive.

I'm writing to give my feedback on the new broadcast feature. While I appreciate that you're always improving the site, I feel this particular change is a downgrade. The new design looks cluttered, especially for local tournaments where lower-rated players often don't have FIDE photos. The result looks awkward. The older version, with just names, was much cleaner, more compact, and non-intrusive.

@Futyporyt said in #12:

I'm writing to give my feedback on the new broadcast feature. While I appreciate that you're always improving the site, I feel this particular change is a downgrade.
The new design looks cluttered, especially for local tournaments where lower-rated players often don't have FIDE photos. The result looks awkward. The older version, with just names, was much cleaner, more compact, and non-intrusive.

This is still the beginning, and the goal is to have even the lowest ones.
But it's also necessary to have the rights to use the image (often the image is copyrighted by the photographer).

@Futyporyt said in #12: > I'm writing to give my feedback on the new broadcast feature. While I appreciate that you're always improving the site, I feel this particular change is a downgrade. > The new design looks cluttered, especially for local tournaments where lower-rated players often don't have FIDE photos. The result looks awkward. The older version, with just names, was much cleaner, more compact, and non-intrusive. This is still the beginning, and the goal is to have even the lowest ones. But it's also necessary to have the rights to use the image (often the image is copyrighted by the photographer).

This is still the beginning, and the goal is to have even the lowest ones.

But... why? Sometimes less is better. Simplicity.
I really don't like the new approach.

> This is still the beginning, and the goal is to have even the lowest ones. But... why? Sometimes less is better. Simplicity. I really don't like the new approach.

@Futyporyt said in #12:

I'm writing to give my feedback on the new broadcast feature. While I appreciate that you're always improving the site, I feel this particular change is a downgrade.
The new design looks cluttered, especially for local tournaments where lower-rated players often don't have FIDE photos. The result looks awkward. The older version, with just names, was much cleaner, more compact, and non-intrusive.

I completely agree that it’s a downgrade, and it looks cluttered.

@Futyporyt said in #12: > I'm writing to give my feedback on the new broadcast feature. While I appreciate that you're always improving the site, I feel this particular change is a downgrade. > The new design looks cluttered, especially for local tournaments where lower-rated players often don't have FIDE photos. The result looks awkward. The older version, with just names, was much cleaner, more compact, and non-intrusive. I completely agree that it’s a downgrade, and it looks cluttered.

So will it change back? Also it’s strange how I have the new look, but someone I know doesn’t.

So will it change back? Also it’s strange how I have the new look, but someone I know doesn’t.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.