@Tbootpoo thanks for the positivity. I do move ahead because other's opinions don't matter to me more than my happiness. And thanks again.....
Ok, good for you :)
@Technobyte1
As I understand it centipawn loss is based on whether your move improves your position.
I've got a "perfect" 0-0-0 40 move rapid game in my bookmark stats yet still I had a 27 centipawn loss indicated...
I did like your game !
As I understand it centipawn loss is based on whether your move improves your position.
I've got a "perfect" 0-0-0 40 move rapid game in my bookmark stats yet still I had a 27 centipawn loss indicated...
I did like your game !
@DERG_CHESS who did i Public shame? I dont know how, cause i dont care for anyone here. I wasnt the one who thinks rating is everything, u and the other guy think it is. So i questioned ur title, deal with it. Seems more like ur ashamed of ur self. But like i said, actually, i dont care
<Comment deleted by user>
@EvilPyrokar said in #34:
> @DERG_CHESS who did i Public shame? I dont know how, cause i dont care for anyone here. I wasnt the one who thinks rating is everything, u and the other guy think it is. So i questioned ur title, deal with it. Seems more like ur ashamed of ur self. But like i said, actually, i dont care
I did not say u public shamed. I said i wasn't the one who started doin it
Also, schlemazel is the one who started making fun of pushwoods rating. Also, how can i think rating is everything if i do not take it serious? See the flaw in ur logic over here? Why should i be ashamed of myself? Also, idc if u question my title, happens all the time. If u do not care, then why u posting here
Edit:spelling mistake
> @DERG_CHESS who did i Public shame? I dont know how, cause i dont care for anyone here. I wasnt the one who thinks rating is everything, u and the other guy think it is. So i questioned ur title, deal with it. Seems more like ur ashamed of ur self. But like i said, actually, i dont care
I did not say u public shamed. I said i wasn't the one who started doin it
Also, schlemazel is the one who started making fun of pushwoods rating. Also, how can i think rating is everything if i do not take it serious? See the flaw in ur logic over here? Why should i be ashamed of myself? Also, idc if u question my title, happens all the time. If u do not care, then why u posting here
Edit:spelling mistake
There is no relationship between average centipawn loss during a game and player rating: web.chessdigits.com/articles/predicting-rating-from-centipawn-loss
@EvilPyrokar said in #34:
> @DERG_CHESS who did i Public shame? I dont know how, cause i dont care for anyone here. I wasnt the one who thinks rating is everything, u and the other guy think it is. So i questioned ur title, deal with it. Seems more like ur ashamed of ur self. But like i said, actually, i dont care
when you public shame others, you public shame yourself
in fact, i feel like you're just jealous of two nice-looking golden letters
> @DERG_CHESS who did i Public shame? I dont know how, cause i dont care for anyone here. I wasnt the one who thinks rating is everything, u and the other guy think it is. So i questioned ur title, deal with it. Seems more like ur ashamed of ur self. But like i said, actually, i dont care
when you public shame others, you public shame yourself
in fact, i feel like you're just jealous of two nice-looking golden letters
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.