lichess.org
Donate

error in new puzzle (played only 50 times)

Solution is mate in one, but two alternatives with 3.6 and 3.4 at depth 37.
Is my PC rigged or this puzzle?:

https://lichess.org/training/vFvfA

Solution is mate in one, but two alternatives with 3.6 and 3.4 at depth 37. Is my PC rigged or this puzzle?: https://lichess.org/training/vFvfA

What is the error, then? ou clearly prefer a finished won game over an 3.4 advantage.

What is the error, then? ou clearly prefer a finished won game over an 3.4 advantage.

The error is that the puzzle has multiple winning moves but just one is marked as correct.

The error is that the puzzle has multiple winning moves but just one is marked as correct.

The instructions say "find the best move", not "find a winning move". Sometimes one may argue that the difference between the best and second best move/line is so small that both should be accepted. Sometimes it is not even completely clear which move is the best as it may depend on personal preferences and even different engine versions or depths may judge differently. But neither is the case here.

The instructions say "find the best move", not "find a winning move". Sometimes one may argue that the difference between the best and second best move/line is so small that both should be accepted. Sometimes it is not even completely clear which move is the best as it may depend on personal preferences and even different engine versions or depths may judge differently. But neither is the case here.

I was assuming every winning move is equally good, thank you for the explanation.

I was assuming every winning move is equally good, thank you for the explanation.

Just lost a game after having had an advantage of +5. And that has happend thousands of times to me. Clearly I'd preferred to have mated them before.
Come on, if you don't spot a mate in 1, there is something you should improve.
I#M still amazed about the high rating of that puzzle.

Just lost a game after having had an advantage of +5. And that has happend thousands of times to me. Clearly I'd preferred to have mated them before. Come on, if you don't spot a mate in 1, there is something you should improve. I#M still amazed about the high rating of that puzzle.

@Sybotes said in #6:

I#M still amazed about the high rating of that puzzle.

That's nothing!
https://lichess.org/training/1nech

@Sybotes said in #6: > I#M still amazed about the high rating of that puzzle. That's nothing! https://lichess.org/training/1nech

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.