Unfair decision

en.lichess.org/mRnUqSGP/white

This is the game I played.. and my opponent had only one bishop.. and i had 2 pawns and a bishop.. i was low on time.. and i thought even if i lost my time.. it would be draw by insufficient material.. but lichess gave my opponent victory .. you people look at the game and say how he can win with a bishop..

White king on a1 and bishop on b1. Black king on a3 and bishop on c3. Checkmate.

then how would you explain this? i lost on time, but regardless of there's helpmate or not, checkmate is not possible in any number of moves

yet! a win was awarded to black

en.lichess.org/yFXKxkXYmFJs

#3 Yes. That position is one of the issues atm.

#3 FIDE Online Arena declares loss in such positions for the first who run out of time because it takes too much computer analysis to identify a dead position.

another issue is

This is automatic draw
en.lichess.org/3mWWjqV8

while this is not!
en.lichess.org/XIodiv7x

the issue with the latter is, either side can still attempt to flag the other player even if it's a theoretical draw. a rather unsportsman result due to it's exploit

#6 Following the FIDE rules requiring no mating sequence to exist the 2nd position is not judged to draw.

Consider the position White Ka8 Ba7 and black Kc8 Bc6 which is a mate.

FIDE Online Arena's page about draw cases could be useful

http://support.premiumchess.net/how-to/draw-cases

Your 1st position is the case 4. The second position is the case 9.

I won this game on time as my opponent never made a move even though there is no series of legal moves that can result in either player being checkmated.

en.lichess.org/S335x1dZ#1

Haha

#6 That isn't an issue, that is how its supposed to be. In the first position neither side can mate the opposing king. In the second position this is possible.