lichess.org
Donate

Trust me: 8x8 chess is DEAD

#1
I'm tempted to pull out of the World Open and just publish the solution to several major openings.

By "solution" I mean that the first 15-20 moves are played perfectly, leading to a position where anyone with even 2400-level technique can hold the draw. This renders chess irrelevant.

Once the drawing lines are published, everyone will start playing them and memorize all the inferior deviations from the drawing line. This is how checkers are solved.

I love knowing how ANGRY my haters get whenever I prove something btw. It's really funny to watch them run their mouths in a way that would repel every woman within earshot. Then again, chessplayers aren't known for social prowess (using a GM title to attract social-climbers doesn't count).
#2
You don't have to pull out of the World Open unless you have more important affairs to do. I seriously believe Chess can be partially solved without a 32 men EGTB. One example is the Ruy Lopez Marshall Attack as a draw with best play from both sides.
#3
@ryan121 said in #2:
> You don't have to pull out of the World Open unless you have more important affairs to do. I seriously believe Chess can be partially solved without a 32 men EGTB. One example is the Ruy Lopez Marshall Attack as a draw with best play from both sides.

I've been threatened and harassed by people who might be there. Aside from calling out child abuse (adults screaming at eight year-old kids), I'm a big threat to their income because I give away superior information for free. Did this in the late 1990s and the "pickup artist" community put a hit out on me and harassed me online (with haters piling on ever since).

I'm consulting with the police. It's as if online stalking laws didn't exist.

Once someone acts out at a tournament while being recorded that will show more than enough.
#4
Take a step back, people: where did anyone ever get the idea that bullying is acceptable behavior?

Pick a fight with someone you damn well better be able to finish it.
#6
Trust me RoundMoundOfUnsound is gonna be chat banned soon
#7
@RoundMoundOfUnsound said in #1:
> I'm tempted to pull out of the World Open and just publish the solution to several major openings.
>
> By "solution" I mean that the first 15-20 moves are played perfectly, leading to a position where anyone with even 2400-level technique can hold the draw. This renders chess irrelevant.
>
> Once the drawing lines are published, everyone will start playing them and memorize all the inferior deviations from the drawing line. This is how checkers are solved.
>
> I love knowing how ANGRY my haters get whenever I prove something btw. It's really funny to watch them run their mouths in a way that would repel every woman within earshot. Then again, chessplayers aren't known for social prowess (using a GM title to attract social-climbers doesn't count).
Tht is exactly why u shuld make ur own opening like me :P
Edit:i didn't do it alone ofc
#8
Chess has 5 to the power of 50 possible positions, it would take litteraly forever for a computer to solve chess
#9
Professor Mound of sound,

You have forgottens one think

Chess become a interested game becauz human brain is low, stupite and not storage of information correct or good. Thus, chest may be solfed, but from horizon and perspectif of human cognition, it is not solfed.

Now of course you placate and entreaty your wisdom to human who is cognitionally trained and mentalistically developed by repetitions and habituation for integrate chessing excellence such as what you says : to memorialize superior openings & what not

Thus, you is claims to have produced superior informations that make chessing result always in the draw among those higher chessing intellect

But, problems is : i doesn't beleifes you.

Becauz, human with trained and developed mental chessing excellence seek out and yield highest quality informations from 1) other similar high-capacity (in chessing exceollence) human and 2) robot, algorithemm and other machine learning process

Thus, for you're clai m to be corrects, you must have prodducet more excellent knowledges than the above aforemtioned thinks

Either
1) you are more higher caliber than highest tier of humans with chessing excellence. But for these to be a true knowledges, you would have tracks recorde to proofs it. But you haves none. Thus, (1) is not a true knowledges
2) you have developet more accurat robot informations than highest trained and highesst powerre human chessing robot, like robot of Googgel. But also similarly likewise, where are your proofs for this ?

In concrusion, I do not beliefed you.

Thus, it may be concluded that you are telling the ties on this liches .orge forums.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.