The ANTI-ANTI-CHESS

Imagine you invite a friend to play a casual anti-chess game.

Usually you both try to win the variant by losing all your pieces; and that is your aim and what defines your strategy to calculate each move.

Suppose you agree with your friend that you both would like to win by losing the variant (not the pieces).

How would you play that game, what strategy would you try?

In other words: you win by losing the anti-chess game. :D

Thoughts?

Cheers,

@DrBeco

I tried this before...
chapter 13

gosh thats jealous

You can play against @anti-anti BOT

Thanks @SurrealTina , I just check it out.

It is so confusing, I had to force my mind to pick the correct goal each move. :D

Hey @finlip ! OMG the internet! You will never find a question that it has no answer anymore! Ahahaha! It was a surprise (good one) to me that we have a anti-anti-bot. Thanks for sharing.

I'm not sure if they have official names but I have heard this as Reverse Antichess, and anti antichess being : Antichess rules, but if you have zero kings on the board you lose. So the goal is to capture the opponents king with antichess forced capturing rules.

word theory anti-anti chess = chess

@nonEsiste I see! Good approach