It seems stockfish 10 is sur-evaluating the positions with 0.2 margin (at least) approximately, compared to stockfish-9.
For example, in a "somewhat better position" for White (carlsbad structure, early middlegame), which gives 51% for White in practice (Chessbase Database), it gives 0.71 at depth 27, whereas stockfish 9 gives the more reasonable (compared to our thinking and to the practical results) 0.50.
0.71 is crazy! This is potentially a major issue.
What do you think about this? (players >2100)