What would most people consider to be a good, an average or a bad rating level?
I'd say 1900+ is good, 1800-1400 is average, 1300 is kinda bad because if you think of 1500 (the rating you start with on here) as 0 and go below that, you're bitting negative which can't be good.
Hear it from the amateurs!
The Ordinary Noob = 0-1200
The Better Noob = 1200-1500
The Average = 1500-1800
The Above Average = 1800-2100
Good = 2100-2400
Above 2400 -> INSANE
Edit: No offense. The rating does not define how skilled you are at chess. No matter what others say, do not let your rating define you :)
A typical 1900 remark!
I have on chess.com rating level 1496 in rapid, here I have now about 1900, rating is nothing)
@Da_One If rating doesn't define how good you are at chess, then what's the point in it? -_-
gsgshs continues to work on his sense-of-humor skills...
You can't post in the forums yet. Play some games!