lichess.org

other chess needs

Ratnakshi_UwU: I have nothing against you either, but go and say your opinion in Afghanistan, for example.

@Buttercup22 said in #4:
> I beat everyone in a tournament while rated 600 and they were sore losers lol.

Or maybe (just maybe) you sandbagged until you were 600 and then entered U1500 tournaments. I would hope you understand why that was wrong, but you calling others sore losers might indicate otherwise...

@Ratnakshi_UwU said in #7:
> @PaveliSz What do u mean? Women can wear whatever they want. Shouldn't interfere with anything else. Especially the messed-up skin covering thing. Are you a 60 year old or smth? you're acting stupid.

Yea!! Let women go topless and do the hoochy coochy in the middle of a tournament to distract their opponent. EQUAL RIGHTS baby EQUAL RIGHTS!!

@jeffsonadam said in #12:
> Or maybe (just maybe) you sandbagged until you were 600 and then entered U1500 tournaments. I would hope you understand why that was wrong, but you calling others sore losers might indicate otherwise...

Whatevs. Maybe I thought it would be funny for a 600, the lowest rating possible, to win. Can't people take a joke these days? But you being so concerned about what's wrong, when lichess marks me as a cheater , the same as an engine user, no one complains that that's wrong. Slandering someone with a cheater, as in engine user, mark when they didn't do that is unjust inappropriate and unfair.

22: Sometimes I disagree that your sticker is a scam, and that may not be true. lichess admins can give you alerts, but you can't respond to them in chat not all admins are bad here, but sometimes they are arrogant and since they don't like something, they block you and you don't have to do anything wrong. I'm wondering if they don't write anything to me again and we can't even talk rudely, and we're mostly grown up and we can write some fun in these sad times that really doesn't offend anyone.

@Buttercup22 said in #14:
> Whatevs. Maybe I thought it would be funny for a 600, the lowest rating possible, to win. Can't people take a joke these days? But you being so concerned about what's wrong, when lichess marks me as a cheater , the same as an engine user, no one complains that that's wrong. Slandering someone with a cheater, as in engine user, mark when they didn't do that is unjust inappropriate and unfair.

I don't see a cheater mark on your account, just one that says you violated the Lichess Terms of Service, and that's exactly what you did, by your own admission. Regarding your first point, it looks like we don't share the same sense of humour, I'm sorry.

@jeffsonadam said in #16:
> I don't see a cheater mark on your account, just one that says you violated the Lichess Terms of Service
That's exactly the same mark a cheater gets. That's the point.

Well, both sandbaggers and cheaters violated the TOS, so that's only fair, imho. It's quite rich for someone who took advantage of a free service and violated its terms of service to question the way they are flagged after being found out. It's not like playing on lichess and having it go your way is your constitutional right or something like that.

jeffsonadam: What did such a cheater do by playing chess with the help of a computer? It makes a lot of people, some of whom don't do their best to see men, but otherwise it's a good cut all over the world from the comfort of home it's a quality substitute in these tough times. The next thing, at least for me, is weird when I don't know what the other player looks like

<Comment deleted by user>

Reconnecting