You write very good, polished English, nice organization of the content, all paragraphs roughly same size, very informative and balanced. Are you from my town? I ask because there is a guy in my town who writes in my local newspaper and has similar eloquent style. I hope everybody learns to write like this soon, so that all over the internet we will come across quality writing that is informative, educative, gives a balanced, well rounded perspective on any topic, which will raise critical thinking and the level of discourse in the internet forums. Look forward to reading more from you.
guys 1 thing is that magnus is playing the blitz
@SarKarlsen17 said in #2:
> Your Text is AI/GPT Generated
> 97.96% AI generated.
> I checked this at
> www.zerogpt.com/
> @Salimu what do you have to say about that??
You paste Martin L King's "I have a dream" there and it's 96.97% AI generated too.
This tool is quite useless.
But I agree that this forum post is AI-generated too.
>Your Text is AI/GPT Generated
>96.97%
>AI GPT*
>I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation.
>Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity.
> Your Text is AI/GPT Generated
> 97.96% AI generated.
> I checked this at
> www.zerogpt.com/
> @Salimu what do you have to say about that??
You paste Martin L King's "I have a dream" there and it's 96.97% AI generated too.
This tool is quite useless.
But I agree that this forum post is AI-generated too.
>Your Text is AI/GPT Generated
>96.97%
>AI GPT*
>I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation.
>Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity.
@SarKarlsen17 said in #2:
> Your Text is AI/GPT Generated
> 97.96% AI generated.
> I checked this at
> www.zerogpt.com/
> @Salimu what do you have to say about that??
the guy who gave me a dislike for #2 post probably does the same job
> Your Text is AI/GPT Generated
> 97.96% AI generated.
> I checked this at
> www.zerogpt.com/
> @Salimu what do you have to say about that??
the guy who gave me a dislike for #2 post probably does the same job
@Salimu said in #1:
> Magnus Carlsen, widely regarded as one of the greatest chess players of all time, recently made headlines for his decision to withdraw from the FIDE World Rapid and Blitz tournament. The decision stemmed from his refusal to adhere to FIDE’s dress code, which resulted in a fine and his subsequent withdrawal. While Carlsen has his grievances with FIDE, particularly over its alleged interference with the Freestyle Chess Grand Slam Tour, his actions in this instance highlight a troubling trend: the inability to separate personal frustrations from professional obligations.
>
> Carlsen’s decision to leave over a “matter of principle” may resonate with some as a stand for individual rights, but it sets a concerning precedent when viewed in the broader context of his influence as a role model. Let us delve into the historical context of similar incidents and the logic of governance in sports to better understand why following established rules is crucial for the integrity of the game and the culture surrounding it.
>
> The Role of Rules in Sport and Society
>
> Sports have always been governed by rules to ensure fairness, discipline, and respect for all participants. These regulations exist not to stifle individuality but to create a level playing field. The dress code at the FIDE event was not an arbitrary imposition; it was decided by the Athletes’ Commission, which includes grandmasters who understand the unique challenges of professional chess.
>
> Carlsen, by opting out of the tournament, sent a message that his personal principles outweigh the collective decisions of the chess community. However, history teaches us that even the greatest talents must respect institutional frameworks to sustain their legacy. Consider Bobby Fischer, another chess legend, whose refusal to compromise with tournament organizers led to his withdrawal from competitive chess for decades. While Fischer’s genius remains undisputed, his inability to navigate institutional rules left a shadow over his career.
>
> Similarly, in other sports, athletes have faced consequences for defying rules, regardless of their stature. Diego Maradona, the iconic footballer, was penalized and banned for drug use during his career. His immense talent did not exempt him from the expectations placed on all players. These incidents remind us that being exceptional does not place one above the collective standards of the sport.
>
> The Responsibility of Role Models
>
> Magnus Carlsen, as a world champion and global icon, carries a significant responsibility. Chess is not just a game; it is a discipline that teaches critical thinking, patience, and respect for the rules. Millions of children look up to Carlsen as a role model. His decision to walk away over a dress code fine sends the wrong message to these aspiring players: that personal pride can supersede adherence to communal standards.
>
> History is replete with examples of individuals who understood the weight of their influence and chose to act responsibly, even under duress. Nelson Mandela, during his imprisonment, adhered to the rules set by his captors not because he agreed with them, but because he understood the power of discipline and the importance of setting a precedent for future generations. Similarly, chess legends like Garry Kasparov have had disagreements with FIDE but found ways to address them without jeopardizing the integrity of tournaments or undermining the community.
>
> The Freestyle Chess Controversy: A Separate Issue
>
> Carlsen’s frustrations with FIDE regarding the Freestyle Chess Grand Slam Tour are valid concerns that merit attention. If FIDE has indeed threatened players for participating in this new initiative, it reflects poorly on the governing body’s willingness to embrace innovation. However, these grievances should be addressed through dialogue and negotiation, not through public outbursts or by walking away from established events.
>
> The line between protest and petulance can often be thin, and Carlsen’s decision to leave the World Rapid and Blitz tournament risks blurring it. He could have used his platform to raise awareness about his concerns while still respecting the event and its rules. Instead, his actions have overshadowed the tournament and alienated many who believe in the importance of discipline in chess.
>
> Balancing Individuality with Responsibility
>
> There is no denying that Carlsen’s genius has elevated chess to new heights, but genius alone cannot sustain a legacy. Respect for rules and the community is what transforms individual brilliance into an enduring contribution. Michael Jordan, for instance, revolutionized basketball not just through his talent but by adhering to the NBA’s structures and promoting the league’s values. He balanced his individuality with respect for the institution, setting an example for generations to come.
>
> Carlsen’s actions, on the other hand, suggest a growing detachment from the very community that supported his rise to prominence. By refusing to change his attire and withdrawing from the event, he undermined the efforts of players who complied with the rules, some of whom may have faced greater challenges to participate.
>
> A Teachable Moment
>
> Carlsen’s withdrawal from the FIDE World Rapid and Blitz tournament is a reminder that talent must be tempered with responsibility. His grievances with FIDE are legitimate, but the manner in which he expressed them was counterproductive and damaging to the chess community.
>
> Rules are not mere formalities; they are the backbone of any organized activity. They ensure fairness, respect, and inclusivity. If Carlsen wishes to inspire the next generation, he must recognize that his actions on and off the board carry weight. Chess is a game of principles, and the greatest champions are those who uphold them, even when it is inconvenient.
>
> As Carlsen reflects on this incident, perhaps he can draw lessons from history: that greatness is not only measured by victories but by the ability to navigate challenges with grace and integrity.
Did you guys expect the title be also AI written?
if no then its AI written.
this dude did not do a single thing
> Magnus Carlsen, widely regarded as one of the greatest chess players of all time, recently made headlines for his decision to withdraw from the FIDE World Rapid and Blitz tournament. The decision stemmed from his refusal to adhere to FIDE’s dress code, which resulted in a fine and his subsequent withdrawal. While Carlsen has his grievances with FIDE, particularly over its alleged interference with the Freestyle Chess Grand Slam Tour, his actions in this instance highlight a troubling trend: the inability to separate personal frustrations from professional obligations.
>
> Carlsen’s decision to leave over a “matter of principle” may resonate with some as a stand for individual rights, but it sets a concerning precedent when viewed in the broader context of his influence as a role model. Let us delve into the historical context of similar incidents and the logic of governance in sports to better understand why following established rules is crucial for the integrity of the game and the culture surrounding it.
>
> The Role of Rules in Sport and Society
>
> Sports have always been governed by rules to ensure fairness, discipline, and respect for all participants. These regulations exist not to stifle individuality but to create a level playing field. The dress code at the FIDE event was not an arbitrary imposition; it was decided by the Athletes’ Commission, which includes grandmasters who understand the unique challenges of professional chess.
>
> Carlsen, by opting out of the tournament, sent a message that his personal principles outweigh the collective decisions of the chess community. However, history teaches us that even the greatest talents must respect institutional frameworks to sustain their legacy. Consider Bobby Fischer, another chess legend, whose refusal to compromise with tournament organizers led to his withdrawal from competitive chess for decades. While Fischer’s genius remains undisputed, his inability to navigate institutional rules left a shadow over his career.
>
> Similarly, in other sports, athletes have faced consequences for defying rules, regardless of their stature. Diego Maradona, the iconic footballer, was penalized and banned for drug use during his career. His immense talent did not exempt him from the expectations placed on all players. These incidents remind us that being exceptional does not place one above the collective standards of the sport.
>
> The Responsibility of Role Models
>
> Magnus Carlsen, as a world champion and global icon, carries a significant responsibility. Chess is not just a game; it is a discipline that teaches critical thinking, patience, and respect for the rules. Millions of children look up to Carlsen as a role model. His decision to walk away over a dress code fine sends the wrong message to these aspiring players: that personal pride can supersede adherence to communal standards.
>
> History is replete with examples of individuals who understood the weight of their influence and chose to act responsibly, even under duress. Nelson Mandela, during his imprisonment, adhered to the rules set by his captors not because he agreed with them, but because he understood the power of discipline and the importance of setting a precedent for future generations. Similarly, chess legends like Garry Kasparov have had disagreements with FIDE but found ways to address them without jeopardizing the integrity of tournaments or undermining the community.
>
> The Freestyle Chess Controversy: A Separate Issue
>
> Carlsen’s frustrations with FIDE regarding the Freestyle Chess Grand Slam Tour are valid concerns that merit attention. If FIDE has indeed threatened players for participating in this new initiative, it reflects poorly on the governing body’s willingness to embrace innovation. However, these grievances should be addressed through dialogue and negotiation, not through public outbursts or by walking away from established events.
>
> The line between protest and petulance can often be thin, and Carlsen’s decision to leave the World Rapid and Blitz tournament risks blurring it. He could have used his platform to raise awareness about his concerns while still respecting the event and its rules. Instead, his actions have overshadowed the tournament and alienated many who believe in the importance of discipline in chess.
>
> Balancing Individuality with Responsibility
>
> There is no denying that Carlsen’s genius has elevated chess to new heights, but genius alone cannot sustain a legacy. Respect for rules and the community is what transforms individual brilliance into an enduring contribution. Michael Jordan, for instance, revolutionized basketball not just through his talent but by adhering to the NBA’s structures and promoting the league’s values. He balanced his individuality with respect for the institution, setting an example for generations to come.
>
> Carlsen’s actions, on the other hand, suggest a growing detachment from the very community that supported his rise to prominence. By refusing to change his attire and withdrawing from the event, he undermined the efforts of players who complied with the rules, some of whom may have faced greater challenges to participate.
>
> A Teachable Moment
>
> Carlsen’s withdrawal from the FIDE World Rapid and Blitz tournament is a reminder that talent must be tempered with responsibility. His grievances with FIDE are legitimate, but the manner in which he expressed them was counterproductive and damaging to the chess community.
>
> Rules are not mere formalities; they are the backbone of any organized activity. They ensure fairness, respect, and inclusivity. If Carlsen wishes to inspire the next generation, he must recognize that his actions on and off the board carry weight. Chess is a game of principles, and the greatest champions are those who uphold them, even when it is inconvenient.
>
> As Carlsen reflects on this incident, perhaps he can draw lessons from history: that greatness is not only measured by victories but by the ability to navigate challenges with grace and integrity.
Did you guys expect the title be also AI written?
if no then its AI written.
this dude did not do a single thing
@LouisXXIV said in #13:
> You paste Martin L King's "I have a dream" there and it's 96.97% AI generated too.
Because Martin L King might've appointed eloquent English men to express his words on a sheet of paper, which he might've learnt and then spoke to public.
> You paste Martin L King's "I have a dream" there and it's 96.97% AI generated too.
Because Martin L King might've appointed eloquent English men to express his words on a sheet of paper, which he might've learnt and then spoke to public.
TL;DR
Excellent essay and writeup. It was truly thought-provoking and a joy to read!
@SarKarlsen17 said in #16:
> Because Martin L King might've appointed eloquent English men to express his words on a sheet of paper, which he might've learnt and then spoke to public.
But being eloquent does not equate to AI generation. A detection system should be able to tell the difference between AI and eloquent human.
> Because Martin L King might've appointed eloquent English men to express his words on a sheet of paper, which he might've learnt and then spoke to public.
But being eloquent does not equate to AI generation. A detection system should be able to tell the difference between AI and eloquent human.
There aren't enough words in the English language that could decently describe my exact, negative feelings I had when reading the second post of this thread.
What Magnus did by withdrawing from the tournament, and his place as a role model for many aspiring players, young and old, can't, and in my own opinion shouldn't, coexist. I was looking forward to the entire Rapid and Blitz World Championships after the great duel between Gukesh and Ding, but this feeling has been blown away in its entirety.
Sorry for not contributing to the discussions at hand. I simply don't understand why people don't take their time to read Salimu's opening text and reflect upon the content.
What Magnus did by withdrawing from the tournament, and his place as a role model for many aspiring players, young and old, can't, and in my own opinion shouldn't, coexist. I was looking forward to the entire Rapid and Blitz World Championships after the great duel between Gukesh and Ding, but this feeling has been blown away in its entirety.
Sorry for not contributing to the discussions at hand. I simply don't understand why people don't take their time to read Salimu's opening text and reflect upon the content.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.