There is a match with 0 inaccuracies, 0 errors 0 blunders, and 0 of centipawn loss?
Yes, 2 bots, 2000000 rated against eachother
lol
there is 21 centipawn loss tho...
Well, depends how you're calculating accuracy. 100% accuracy would be the engine whose evaluation is being used to calculate accuracy, playing against itself. Can this engine be beaten? Probably. But chess is such an insanely complex game that, as of yet, a mathematically unbeatable engine has not yet been made.
i am sure this is close lichess.org/stA2YL4q/black
This is not the perfect match, even because I lost, but there are, 0 inaccuracies, 0
errors, 0 mistakes and 5 Centipawn Loss
That was the smallest amount of centipawm loss that I was able to do
No doubt it would be perfectly boring to play over as well.
A game having 0 centipawn loss does not mean it's perfect, it just means that's what Stockfish would've played on every move. Chess is not a solved game, so Stockfish or any other engine doesn't play perfectly even if they play much better than humans.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.