It is a mate prevail and yet i lose? i need answer to this matter thank you.
61.... Qb5+ 62.Kxb5 Rb7 63.a6 Bc3 64.axb7 a6+ 65.Kxb6 Ba5+ 66.Kxa5 a5 67.Kxa5 Kd6 68.b8Q+ and White wins.
That's the rule. ;)
That's the rule. ;)
66. Kxa5 a5? A pawn cannot move to an already-occupied square.
Regardless, @alove2kill , what jupp is attempting to say is that if there is a possible continuation of the game where White can checkmate, no matter how unlikely it is, then the game is counted as a loss instead of a draw.
Regardless, @alove2kill , what jupp is attempting to say is that if there is a possible continuation of the game where White can checkmate, no matter how unlikely it is, then the game is counted as a loss instead of a draw.
this is a time issue, not a mating issue
61. ... ba5 0:1 or draw
61. ... b5 instant draw
61. ... letting your time run out: 1:0
61. ... b5 instant draw
61. ... letting your time run out: 1:0
You lost because you had no time anymore, why are you asking ?
Ignoring the actual question,
61 ... Qd3# though right?
61 ... Qd3# though right?
@cannibalKush2 yeah lol qd3# is mate.
@alove2kill you lost because time run out and white had a pawn.
If white had insufficient material for a win (a bishop or a knight) it would have ended in a draw.
The pawn isn't insufficient material because it can promote to a piece that can win the game regardless of the fact that in your particular game white had no chance of winning.
If white had insufficient material for a win (a bishop or a knight) it would have ended in a draw.
The pawn isn't insufficient material because it can promote to a piece that can win the game regardless of the fact that in your particular game white had no chance of winning.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.