I would like to know something.
Your investigation system about cheating is based on an algorithm, I think.
I would like to know from a moderator, if possible, how a violation report submitted by a player or reported by the algorithm is checked.
Who decides who should be banned from the system?
What is the procedural process to arrive at this decision?
Can an algorithm wrong?
Can a moderator wrong?
If a moderator was wrong to interpret a player's data, and therefore that the player himself was forced to appeal, and that the appeal is negative, how can the player rehabilitate his position within the system, given that player has been deprived of the ability to contest the decision?
Your investigation system about cheating is based on an algorithm, I think.
I would like to know from a moderator, if possible, how a violation report submitted by a player or reported by the algorithm is checked.
Who decides who should be banned from the system?
What is the procedural process to arrive at this decision?
Can an algorithm wrong?
Can a moderator wrong?
If a moderator was wrong to interpret a player's data, and therefore that the player himself was forced to appeal, and that the appeal is negative, how can the player rehabilitate his position within the system, given that player has been deprived of the ability to contest the decision?