Hmmm, 9.0-0-0?! was inaccurate... server analysis says 9.0-0-0 was best...!?!?

Here's a new one on me. I played this game as a guest, then logged on to see what the server analysis had to say. Check it out: lichess.org/LUnfhqgV#17

Well, i personally think lichess is not what most think it might be.
Its a fishy chess platform.
But problem is once you're sucked in , its hard to find out...,

It's quite common for a engine to like a certain move at a low depth and dislike it at higher depths.

I'm replying to my own post because I can only see that the basic moves without server analysis were posted. Maybe there's a way to post the analysis link without the pop-up game-board...?

This sort of thing should only confirm that you shouldn't be paying too much attention to engine opening evaluations in the first place. ;)

Wait. This problem came long back. Isn't it resolved yet. I ask this to some mod out there.

You can wait a lifetime for issues to be fixed here....issues from some years ago, are still not fixed...

Furthermore, if you try to follow the line within the variation given, it defaults out to the game. You can't click on, say, move 12 in the parenthetical line and get it on the board (at least not in this dimension.) Is it a Stockfish 15 glitch, or something to do with the server code overall?

Why does it say In Accuracy: 0-0-0 was best?!

This is due to re-analysis of a game with a higher SF version or more „depth“. There might be some compromises to be made.

It’s easily fixed via cloud analysis:
Just analyze the position deeper (if you have a bad PC, just post in game analysis or feedback, someone will do it for you).