Cheating detection absent in lichess

@Cedur216 said in #22:

then you're all the more not entitled to your claims (I mean, you aren't anyway, because your attitude is simply not true). Reporting by suspicion and gut feeling is everyday business and mods get along well with it.
@Cedur216 said in #22:
then you're all the more not entitled to your claims (I mean, you aren't anyway, because your attitude is simply not true). Reporting by suspicion and gut feeling is everyday business and mods get along well with it.
@sammgus said in #40:
No one is cheating to play at your rating. If they were cheating they would be climbing rating quickly - most cheaters will start at 1500 and go up, not down. It is quite possible that you have never played a cheater.

If you think high accuracy indicates cheating, look to see if you make any mistakes. If you blunder, it is easy for the opponent to find strong moves, which makes the accuracy look high when you lose. But the mistakes are yours to own, don't look for excuses.

I think you live on the moon.

It's a massively if it not infinitely incorrect point of view.
Very clearly and demonstrably, many used have shown extremely high accuracy games and shown how early blunders make this common.
Even 1300 rated players have shown 97% accuracy games
Including blunders and simple positions
So please get with reality.

^^

@PacificRed said in #42:

It's a massively if it not infinitely incorrect point of view.
Very clearly and demonstrably, many used have shown extremely high accuracy games and shown how early blunders make this common.
Even 1300 rated players have shown 97% accuracy games
Including blunders and simple positions
So please get with reality.

^^

I agree. Same my wiew as wrote in #15. Once, I won an 8 moves game with 100% accuracy. So what:? I did not cheat obviosly. That's why I do not like the reporting system in lichess based on personal suspicious enaluations.

@Morobiondo said in #43:

I agree. Same my wiew as wrote in #15. Once, I won an 8 moves game with 100% accuracy. So what:? I did not cheat obviosly. That's why I do not like the reporting system in lichess based on personal suspicious enaluations.

Are you saying that describing why in your opinion the player you're accusing of cheating is actually cheating is wrong and that just clicking on a box without the possibility to write a word like you do in chesscom is right and better?

@Deadban said in #44:

Are you saying that describing why in your opinion the player you're accusing of cheating is actually cheating is wrong and that just clicking on a box without the possibility to write a word like you do in chesscom is right and better?

" is actually cheating " is the very wrong part of your sentence beacuse cannot be true at the time of accusation, it is not
objectively verified at that time.

But you have not answered the question.

@Deadban said in #46:

But you have not answered the question.

I did not ansewered indeed bacause the question itself is faulty.

@Morobiondo said in #1:

Over 6K games played and no chetating detected. In chess.com (free) they detect and find this kind of abuses...
Do you know the reasons why?
Because of false bans for 'external assistance' because I played some London line.
Lichess has honest players hence less bans and chess.com has more players so more cheaters and false bans.

@Morobiondo said in #1:

Over 6K games played and no chetating detected. In chess.com (free) they detect and find this kind of abuses...
Guessing it's a bad time for this but,

*cheating

If you slowly cheat it does not check like win 2 matches and lose 1 match . But I think it also compares your game quality with your other matches . So if your game quality is too good in more than one match you get banned .