Can someone explainme this analisys? • page 1/1 • General Chess Discussion • lichess.org

Tinchin

I run an analisys over this game. During the game i felt that my opponent blunder a lot and that i was not particullary searching for the best moves... however i was surprised when the engine give those results. ¿only 1 blunder and some innacuracies? i dont really get it

https://lichess.org/OP8hcpLg/white#0

I run an analisys over this game. During the game i felt that my opponent blunder a lot and that i was not particullary searching for the best moves... however i was surprised when the engine give those results. ¿only 1 blunder and some innacuracies? i dont really get it https://lichess.org/OP8hcpLg/white#0

PTX187

Do you think that some of your opponent's moves deserve a more negative assessment? I think so too)

What is the difference between an inaccuracy, a mistake, and a blunder - this was discussed a year ago:
https://lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/what-is-the-difference-between-blunders-mistakes-and-inaccuracies-in-chess-mean?page=2

Do you think that some of your opponent's moves deserve a more negative assessment? I think so too) What is the difference between an inaccuracy, a mistake, and a blunder - this was discussed a year ago: https://lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/what-is-the-difference-between-blunders-mistakes-and-inaccuracies-in-chess-mean?page=2

JuicyChickenNO1

There's a threshold after which pointing out which moves are good or bad stops being relevant. It's not a Stockfish feature, but rather a Lichess thing. Your advantage was so big after the first few moves that subtle stuff just didn't matter anymore.

Tinchin

@PTX187 Yeah! i think so. Lol. And perhaphs some of mines too. Checking the post now. Thank you

Alientcp

edited

By move 9 the game was objectively over.

There is really not much your opponent can do to prevent white from winning.
The game will go downhill from that part for black. It doesnt matter what it does. That was the blunder.. Now, once the game is "over" the analysis becomes more or less "the best possible move to delay the actual loss." Inaccuracies for black are moves that short of blunders that accelerate the loss, and brilliant moves for black become moves that stall or prolong the game more than necessary.

When the game is won already, you dont check how good your opponent was to stall the game. ignore the eval for your opponent. You only rate your own moves to check for your efficiency to convert.
It is important to review your technique, as it matter in close games, but when there is nothing prevent you from winning, it doesnt matter if you win in 1 or 3 moves.

Sometimes you have a mate in 1, a computer sacks a piece to delay it, it will flag it as a good move, your 2 options are to capture with the king or queen. If you capture with the king, well, the mate in 1 is a mate in 2, since you had to capture with the king first.
If you capture with the queen, it becomes a mate in 3, since you have to capture, and then reposition the queen to the original square and then the mate. Your opponent did the best possible move to delay the game, but it doesnt matter, the game was lost already and how you captured has no meaningful impact in the amount of moves to end nor the result. Only checks for your finesse, as capturing with the king will be flagged as an inaccuracy since you could have been more efficient.
The engine is dumb most of the times in sealed games. Dont pay attention to it.

By move 9 the game was objectively over. There is really not much your opponent can do to prevent white from winning. The game will go downhill from that part for black. It doesnt matter what it does. That was the blunder.. Now, once the game is "over" the analysis becomes more or less "the best possible move to delay the actual loss." Inaccuracies for black are moves that short of blunders that accelerate the loss, and brilliant moves for black become moves that stall or prolong the game more than necessary. When the game is won already, you dont check how good your opponent was to stall the game. ignore the eval for your opponent. You only rate your own moves to check for your efficiency to convert. It is important to review your technique, as it matter in close games, but when there is nothing prevent you from winning, it doesnt matter if you win in 1 or 3 moves. Sometimes you have a mate in 1, a computer sacks a piece to delay it, it will flag it as a good move, your 2 options are to capture with the king or queen. If you capture with the king, well, the mate in 1 is a mate in 2, since you had to capture with the king first. If you capture with the queen, it becomes a mate in 3, since you have to capture, and then reposition the queen to the original square and then the mate. Your opponent did the best possible move to delay the game, but it doesnt matter, the game was lost already and how you captured has no meaningful impact in the amount of moves to end nor the result. Only checks for your finesse, as capturing with the king will be flagged as an inaccuracy since you could have been more efficient. The engine is dumb most of the times in sealed games. Dont pay attention to it.

Shamendra07

Wrong topic bro.
https://lichess.org/forum/game-analysis
Write in this.

Wrong topic bro. https://lichess.org/forum/game-analysis Write in this.

CM DERG_CHESS

@Shamendra07 said in #6:

Wrong topic bro.
lichess.org/forum/game-analysis
Write in this.
Not rlly. He is not asking how he played, rather why the Evaluation of the computer was like this

@Shamendra07 said in #6: > Wrong topic bro. > lichess.org/forum/game-analysis > Write in this. Not rlly. He is not asking how he played, rather why the Evaluation of the computer was like this