I am around 1800-1900 on lichess tactics. want to know how bad is it and also what is an average rating. i am aiming for 2000. is 2000 good?
Its relative
I'm around 1850 these days. You can see my other ratings and compare. As "the_loving_boy" mentioned it's relative of course. Plus I think lichess doesn't cut down points for solving times so it also matter if you spend 10-20 mins for a puzzle or if you solve around 30secs, I don't know. But it's always better to aim for better of course :)
I spend about 1-5 minute per puzzle
mostly 2-3 minutes
Spider_hip your rapid rating is solid man
mostly 2-3 minutes
Spider_hip your rapid rating is solid man
@sameartist I answered this question using actual data in this post:
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/tactics-vs-game-ratings-a-statistical-analysis-5000-lichess-players
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/tactics-vs-game-ratings-a-statistical-analysis-5000-lichess-players
I think the puzzles are useful, but it's possible to have around a 2000 tactics rating and still be quite bad a chess.
@dudeski_robinson
I read your article and it's nice to hear that tactics are very important, but as you can see my tactics score is 1900, but i am about 1700 in bullet
I read your article and it's nice to hear that tactics are very important, but as you can see my tactics score is 1900, but i am about 1700 in bullet
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.