I just traded two bishops for a rook in a game I play. It was an accidental blunder to be honest as i mis-caculated thinking i could take the knight back. But generally speaking, I've come across similar situations before.
Is it a major blunder to trade a knight and bishop for a rook? I've come across that situation alot so is it a blunder or good/justifiable?
I know two bishops for a rook is probably not a good trade? Not sure on the knight and bishop for rook though.
Link to game although its just a general question rather then anything specifically to do with this game:
move 21
If two GMs are playing an end game, same number of pawns. One has one knight and bishop and the other has just a rook, who wins?
Thanks all
Is it a major blunder to trade a knight and bishop for a rook? I've come across that situation alot so is it a blunder or good/justifiable?
I know two bishops for a rook is probably not a good trade? Not sure on the knight and bishop for rook though.
Link to game although its just a general question rather then anything specifically to do with this game:
move 21
If two GMs are playing an end game, same number of pawns. One has one knight and bishop and the other has just a rook, who wins?
Thanks all