I beat Stockfish level 8 with black pieces finally

@paranoyaksabunu
You didn’t beat SF fairly I don’t see SF getting a million takebacks.

Very nice game. Congrats.

@JohnLuke090904 hmm true ok I will try again

also not fxe5 g4 is better

Hi sir
@JohnLuke090904
Yeah, it totally seems so. One can see the average centipawn loss of @paranoyaksabunu is just 16. Moreover, take backs after take backs. When I saw a few games of Mikhail Tal imported at Lichess.org, there I saw average centipawn loss of Mikhail Tal as 16, 18, 27, etc. How can this man be greater than the Magician of Riga?? Also, the mistakes by Stockfish 8 in the mentioned game was because of the reason that we have a newer and advanced high level Stockfish 10 to analyse and it gave a better moves that were actually more stronger. Even Magnus Carlsen has not beaten Stockfish 8. Only one mistake is enough to lose the game against Stockfish 8 except when one does numerous take backs. With that, I can also say that I can defeat Stockfish 8 without computer assistance irrespective of number of take backs. Èven after numerous take backs, winning against Stockfish 8 is like dream come true or very rare. On the other hand, you @paranoyaksabunu have numerous losses against Stockfish 8 in 7, 10, 11, [12, 16, 18 (multiple times)]!! What are they in context to your victory!! When you will win against Stockfish 8 properly (not on time) with no cheating and no take back then you will be officially counted among the chess grandmasters of all time and only then everyone including me will believe that you can in fact win against Stockfish 8 and that very moment I would apologise to you!! See you soon! Bye
#StaySafe
#WorldFightsCorona

I have a question. How many moves did you look ahead in each move to beat the machine?

@#15 This guy is not better than Tal of course. Tal didn't play against a computer. So if a grandmaster made a blunder then Tal didn't play computer's best move, but made some mistake too, but in such a way that his opponent made even bigger blunder and lost the game in the end. It's a totally different style than computer chess.

And here he was not playing against Stockfish 8. He played lichess computer level 8, which is much weaker than the Stockfish.

@pointlesswindows #17
I meant that no common chess player or amateur can have higher rating or less average centipawn loss against anyone!! Although at that time even computers were not there but now with help of current technology we are able to analyse the historic recorded chess games by grandmasters! Comparing this to any player's stats and taking @paranoyaksabunu as example we saw that @paranoyaksabunu has less centipawn loss than the Magician of Riga.... So the questions that itself asks to be answered is: Is @paranoyaksabunu greater than Mikhail Tal or is he not a common man and instead is new TAL!!
#Tal
Your latter part is absolutely wrong!! See that the name of his opponent is Stockfish AI level 8!

@pointlesswindows #17
Also, when you analyse Mikhail Tal's games you see that he did not play engine's best moves. Instead he player inaccurate or mistakes which he misjudged as best moves. So how did Tal manage to win his games and widely be regarded as Magician of Riga?? Simply because of the fact that any wrong reply will lead to self-destruction. In most of his games his opponent's failed to defend properly and precisely in order to win!! If Stockfish would be present at that time, it would definitely beat Mikhail Tal. Also I saw his matches several videos, where he lost after playing such kind of moves with which he had successfully won against many!

You didn't understand. It is a weaker version of Stockfish called level 8. Real Stockfish will be like level 20 using this names.