Nice!
Personally I feel the Nimzo-Larsen, starts slow but man it can be aggressive.
ARGH, MY EYES!!!
Nimzo-Laren sounds pretty cool, right @JA10306 ? But did you realize, that already on move 2 you ruined all your beloved Nimzo-Larsen ambitions and just transposed into the French Defence?
Ah, and on 9.c3 you blundered a pawn...
Hint: In the N-L you'd normally want to put youre-pawn on e3 and sometimes your c-pawn to c4 in some lines, to challenge the centre (in a non-french way).
Nimzo-Laren sounds pretty cool, right @JA10306 ? But did you realize, that already on move 2 you ruined all your beloved Nimzo-Larsen ambitions and just transposed into the French Defence?
Ah, and on 9.c3 you blundered a pawn...
Hint: In the N-L you'd normally want to put youre-pawn on e3 and sometimes your c-pawn to c4 in some lines, to challenge the centre (in a non-french way).
NOT REALLY A VICTORY GAME BUT THE OPPONENT RESIGNED AND DIDN'T GET A MATE OR ANYTHING
<Comment deleted by user>
@AKANKSHA5F said in #5:
> NOT REALLY A VICTORY GAME BUT THE OPPONENT RESIGNED AND DIDN'T GET A MATE OR ANYTHING
He RESIGNED which literally means VICTORY. not sure how else I can explain it.
there are 2 ways to win in chess...Checkmate or Your opponent resigns. He resigned because I was in a strong position (up +6 points in material) The only way I lose from the last position is if I blunder multiple times.
So yea, it was absolutely a VICTORY lol have a great day
> NOT REALLY A VICTORY GAME BUT THE OPPONENT RESIGNED AND DIDN'T GET A MATE OR ANYTHING
He RESIGNED which literally means VICTORY. not sure how else I can explain it.
there are 2 ways to win in chess...Checkmate or Your opponent resigns. He resigned because I was in a strong position (up +6 points in material) The only way I lose from the last position is if I blunder multiple times.
So yea, it was absolutely a VICTORY lol have a great day
@derkleineJo said in #4:
> ARGH, MY EYES!!!
>
> Nimzo-Laren sounds pretty cool, right @JA10306 ? But did you realize, that already on move 2 you ruined all your beloved Nimzo-Larsen ambitions and just transposed into the French Defence?
>
> Ah, and on 9.c3 you blundered a pawn...
>
> Hint: In the N-L you'd normally want to put youre-pawn on e3 and sometimes your c-pawn to c4 in some lines, to challenge the centre (in a non-french way).
I immediately stopped reading what you had to say when you said "and on 9.c3 you blundered a pawn) because according to the engine I had 0 Blunders. hence why I shared it.
Thanks for your criticism i guess. have a great day
> ARGH, MY EYES!!!
>
> Nimzo-Laren sounds pretty cool, right @JA10306 ? But did you realize, that already on move 2 you ruined all your beloved Nimzo-Larsen ambitions and just transposed into the French Defence?
>
> Ah, and on 9.c3 you blundered a pawn...
>
> Hint: In the N-L you'd normally want to put youre-pawn on e3 and sometimes your c-pawn to c4 in some lines, to challenge the centre (in a non-french way).
I immediately stopped reading what you had to say when you said "and on 9.c3 you blundered a pawn) because according to the engine I had 0 Blunders. hence why I shared it.
Thanks for your criticism i guess. have a great day