A particularly silly King's Gambit game:
https://lichess.org/CHOaPDK3/white#0
A particularly silly King's Gambit game:
https://lichess.org/CHOaPDK3/white#0
A particularly silly King's Gambit game:
Question: how are you 1400? Lemme be frank, it was more 800 to 900 level.
not bad, interesting King March, You should be quite brave to play like that, Cool to see, even it's much of inaccurate
@IamNOTamod said in #2:
Question: how are you 1400? Lemme be frank, it was more 800 to 900 level.
I am sorry that you feel the need to display such bad manners.
This game was an unusual one, hence its appearance here.
@coledavis said in #4:
Question: how are you 1400? Lemme be frank, it was more 800 to 900 level.
I am sorry that you feel the need to display such bad manners.
This game was an unusual one, hence its appearance here.
I am truly sorry you feel insulted. I did not mean to offend, just to question the poor quality of the game given your rating.
" just to question the poor quality of the game given your rating."
I understand what you said, but I do not see why you would want to, except to be offensive ("Lemme be frank").
@coledavis said in #6:
" just to question the poor quality of the game given your rating."
I understand what you said, but I do not see why you would want to, except to be offensive ("Lemme be frank").
I shall adjust my phrasing next time.
It's nothing to do with the way it was put.
I try not to make personal comments on the forums, even if I do fiercely argue a case.
@coledavis said in #8:
It's nothing to do with the way it was put.
I try not to make personal comments on the forums, even if I do fiercely argue a case.
I'm sorry if you feel insulted...it was simply a comment on the game quality (that it was 800 or 900 level), not your skills.
One point I would make:
The rating of a player is built up from that player's performance against other players, essentially a normative measure.
It is only an indirect indicator of what to expect in any given game.