Comments on https://lichess.org/@/agm-potuzhniy/blog/agm-a-title-that-doesnt-seem-to-exist/cPSyUC3a
AGM is just not a valid title for the LTA. Also, it can not be seen as good that only 400 players have that title- It's just to bad.
AGM requires 1900 online rating wtf? Where is the strenght from which you spoke? Anymways, have a good day.
@The_ERuptodon said in #2:
> AGM is just not a valid title for the LTA. Also, it can not be seen as good that only 400 players have that title- It's just to bad.
> AGM requires 1900 online rating wtf? Where is the strenght from which you spoke? Anymways, have a good day.
Funny how a titled player feels threatened by a title he claims is “too bad.”
AGM isn’t about being above or below FM — it’s about verified skill and clean performance in a stricter system.
Maybe the problem isn’t the title. Maybe it’s your ego.
I totally agree! I think AGM deserves to have a title on lichess.
it not about verified skill, and that's the point.
@The_ERuptodon said in #5:
> it not about verified skill, and that's the point.
Does your 2300 FIDE rating in classical chess help you in the game Bullet 1+0 on Lichess? Is it possible in the game 3+0? This is a completely different chess, and you don't have to be a grandmaster to understand this. Your achievements in classical chess only indicate that you spent several thousand dollars on this game. Do the math yourself, and evaluate the rationality of your actions
Totally agree, AGM need to be existed that is like GM on arena. No one see the problem to add AGM we need this rank.