It's insane how the knight was trapped from the middlegame to the endgame, it's really satisfying to get wins like these, squeezing your opponent slowly but surely, and that's such an instructive game with a very nice analysis, great job!
What about the knight in Reshevsky vs. Treysman, 1938? I think that one is a lot worse!
@Gordijnrails said in #3:
> What about the knight in Reshevsky vs. Treysman, 1938? I think that one is a lot worse!
I checked this game and I still don't understand how thats possible. Poor horsey
> What about the knight in Reshevsky vs. Treysman, 1938? I think that one is a lot worse!
I checked this game and I still don't understand how thats possible. Poor horsey
@amazighi said in #2:
> It's insane how the knight was trapped from the middlegame to the endgame, it's really satisfying to get wins like these, squeezing your opponent slowly but surely, and that's such an instructive game with a very nice analysis, great job!
> It's insane how the knight was trapped from the middlegame to the endgame, it's really satisfying to get wins like these, squeezing your opponent slowly but surely, and that's such an instructive game with a very nice analysis, great job!
@Gordijnrails said in #3:
> What about the knight in Reshevsky vs. Treysman, 1938? I think that one is a lot worse!
> What about the knight in Reshevsky vs. Treysman, 1938? I think that one is a lot worse!
@Gordijnrails said in #3:
> What about the knight in Reshevsky vs. Treysman, 1938? I think that one is a lot worse!
> What about the knight in Reshevsky vs. Treysman, 1938? I think that one is a lot worse!
@LD_Sayulnethdula, that is true (in my opinion)
> @LD_Sayulnethdula, that is true (in my opinion) What
Good analysis and nice game. Thanks for sharing!
The bit about 0-0-0 where b2 might hang was a nice detail that we'd easily miss in less time.
The bit about 0-0-0 where b2 might hang was a nice detail that we'd easily miss in less time.