[Event "Champions Challenge 123rd"] [Site "playchess.com INT"] [Date "2005.12.03"] [Round "2.3"] [White "Hoffer, David"] [Black "Meister, Jakob"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "3AVS2DF3"] [WhiteElo "2392"] [BlackElo "2490"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "-"] [ECO "A45"] [Opening "Indian Defense: Gibbins-Weidenhagen Gambit, Stummer Gambit"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. Nc3 { [%eval -0.33] } 1... Nf6 { [%eval 0.09] } 2. g4?! { (0.09 → -0.85) Inaccuracy. e4 was best. } { [%eval -0.85] } (2. e4 e5 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. Be2 d5 5. exd5 Nxd5 6. Bb5 Nxc3) 2... Nxg4 { [%eval -0.83] } 3. e4 { [%eval -0.87] } 3... d6 { [%eval -0.91] } 4. Be2 { [%eval -0.95] } 4... Nf6 { [%eval -0.96] } 5. d4 { [%eval -0.86] } { A45 Indian Defense: Gibbins-Weidenhagen Gambit, Stummer Gambit } 5... e5 { [%eval -0.59] } 6. dxe5 { [%eval -0.47] } 6... dxe5 { [%eval -0.53] } 7. Qxd8+ { [%eval -0.86] } 7... Kxd8 { [%eval -0.49] } 8. Bg5 { [%eval -0.92] } 8... c6 { [%eval -0.78] } 9. Nf3 { [%eval -0.86] } 9... Nd7 { [%eval -0.78] } 10. O-O-O { [%eval -1.12] } 10... Kc7 { [%eval -1.17] } 11. Bc4?! { (-1.17 → -1.76) Inaccuracy. Bh4 was best. } { [%eval -1.76] } (11. Bh4 Ne8) 11... Bb4?? { (-1.76 → 0.00) Blunder. Ng4 was best. } { [%eval 0.0] } (11... Ng4) 12. Bxf6?? { (0.00 → -1.82) Blunder. Rhg1 was best. } { [%eval -1.82] } (12. Rhg1 Bxc3 13. bxc3 Nxe4 14. Be7 Nxc3 15. Bd6+ Kb6 16. Rd3 Ne2+ 17. Kd2 Nxg1 18. Rb3+ Ka5) 12... gxf6?! { (-1.82 → -0.94) Inaccuracy. Nxf6 was best. } { [%eval -0.94] } (12... Nxf6) 13. Bxf7 { [%eval -1.32] } 13... Bxc3 { [%eval -0.94] } 14. bxc3 { [%eval -0.95] } 14... Nc5 { [%eval -0.91] } 15. Rde1?! { (-0.91 → -1.50) Inaccuracy. Nd2 was best. } { [%eval -1.5] } (15. Nd2 Be6 16. Bxe6 Nxe6 17. f3 Rhg8 18. Nf1 b5 19. Rd2 a5 20. Ne3 h5 21. Rhd1 Rad8) 15... Rf8 { [%eval -1.5] } 16. Bh5?! { (-1.50 → -2.31) Inaccuracy. Bb3 was best. } { [%eval -2.31] } (16. Bb3 a5) 16... Rg8 { [%eval -1.8] } 17. Nd2 { [%eval -1.85] } 17... Be6 { [%eval -1.84] } 18. Nb3 { [%eval -2.3] } 18... Na4 { [%eval -2.48] } 19. Re3 { [%eval -2.67] } 19... Rg2 { [%eval -2.25] } 20. f4? { (-2.25 → -3.96) Mistake. Rf3 was best. } { [%eval -3.96] } (20. Rf3 Rf8) 20... exf4 { [%eval -4.15] } 21. Rf3 { [%eval -4.79] } 21... Rg5 { [%eval -4.71] } 22. Nd4 { [%eval -4.6] } 22... Bxa2 { [%eval -4.63] } 23. Rh3 { [%eval -4.29] } 23... Rag8 { [%eval -3.54] } 24. Kd2 { [%eval -4.07] } 24... Rg2+ { [%eval -5.11] } 25. Be2 { [%eval -5.05] } 25... Bc4 { [%eval -5.05] } 26. Rxh7+ { [%eval -6.23] } 26... Kb8 { [%eval -6.46] } 27. Rb1 { [%eval -7.67] } 27... Nb6 { [%eval -7.39] } 28. Rf1 { [%eval -8.69] } 28... Bxe2?! { (-8.69 → -5.02) Inaccuracy. c5 was best. } { [%eval -5.02] } (28... c5) 29. Nxe2 { [%eval -5.25] } 29... Nc4+ { [%eval -5.55] } 30. Kd3?! { (-5.55 → -9.41) Inaccuracy. Ke1 was best. } { [%eval -9.41] } (30. Ke1 Ne3 31. Rf2 Nxc2+ 32. Kf1 Ne3+ 33. Ke1 Rxf2 34. Kxf2 a5 35. Nxf4 Nd1+ 36. Kf3 a4) 30... Ne5+ { [%eval -9.25] } 31. Kd2 { [%eval -9.55] } 31... f3 { [%eval -9.57] } 32. Rb1? { (-9.57 → Mate in 3) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Rxf3 was best. } { [%eval #-3] } (32. Rxf3 Nxf3+) 32... Rxe2+ { [%eval #-2] } 33. Kc1 { [%eval #-2] } 33... Rg1+?! { (Mate in 2 → -21.26) Lost forced checkmate sequence. Nd3+ was best. } { [%eval -21.26] } (33... Nd3+ 34. cxd3 Rg1#) 34. Kb2 { [%eval -20.0] } 34... Rxb1+ { [%eval #-9] } 35. Kxb1 { [%eval #-9] } 35... f2 { [%eval #-8] } { White resigns. } 0-1